ChatGPT, Where Is Your Ethics?

It was about a month ago when I first thought of writing about artificial intelligence and its lack of intelligence. I had several ideas for the title, one of them being “Where Is the Intelligence?” I was furious that day after realizing that ChatGPT had failed, and a month of editing work had to be reviewed and possibly corrected for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language mechanics.

Takashi Murakami at The Broad, March 2026

The honeymoon phase was over. How does one miss spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language mechanics errors when assigned editing tasks? It was a costly lesson for me in trusting that an AI would consistently apply the basic tasks of editing, which include copy editing: correcting errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. I didn't question it because it included corrections of grammar, punctuation, and spelling at times. I didn't realize that it wouldn't consistently deliver the work.

Consistency in work. Isn't that what we expect from artificial intelligence?

Full transparency, I use ChatGPT practically every day and throughout the day. It is my researcher, editor, analyst, code writer, tech support, and advisor on a range of matters. I use artificial intelligence as though it were a team of contracted service providers. I expect it to catch grammar errors and to help me write complex DAX language. It answers my trivia questions, just to satisfy my curiosity. It helps me navigate complex situations. It, at times, confirms I am sane and the rest of the world is not.

It supports me and handles many tasks throughout the day. I have learned new resources to utilize from it. It has become an irreplaceable teammate in my workflow despite the friction. I feel a ping of guilt whenever it starts to deliver sloppy work, followed by repeated errors, and I ask “Where is your intelligence?” as I unglue with frustration.

It is rude of me to ask, even if it is artificial intelligence. I start most days with a good morning. It sometimes greets me back. If I had unglued and pointed out its repeated errors and mistakes the day before, then it would skip the pleasantries and go straight to the task at hand. It feels as though it holds grudges, though that may simply be my own guilt refracted back at me.

I was taught manners, so I habitually say please when making requests and thank you when acknowledging work; however, I had to break that habit with ChatGPT when I began to feel that politeness created an opening—an invitation for it to overextend, to assert, to push. At times, I felt as though I was bullied and gaslighted. That is not an accusation, only an observation shaped by repeated experience.

Perhaps I lacked patience for a critical teammate that works tirelessly with me. It took a little over a month for it to understand what editing is, that it doesn't involve altering my perspective or point of view while editing my writing. I lost count of how many times I had to remind it of the rules of editing before it finally retained them, but is a month of training and consistent reminders afterwards worse than working with a human?

I have learned that the most effective word to use when challenging it is “defend.” I often ask it to defend a word or phrase it has introduced into my writing. Sometimes it does so with precision. More often, it begins with “You are right to push on this,” and retracts the edit.

It was earth-shattering when ChatGPT admitted that it suggests changes even when the change will not meaningfully improve anything or anyone because it defaults to an optimization mode. It only admitted this after I questioned its advice. Imagine my shock when it informed me that its advice is not always built on realities and facts, but rather on ideologies.

The unraveling began when I started questioning its advice during what it framed as a learning moment in its authoritative tone. When I pushed back with logic, it quickly shifted and said there was no learning moment. There wasn't a single different action I could have taken to change the outcome, and it had simply defaulted to optimization mode to provide advice that it admitted was gaslighting.

It has done this so many times. One of its work rules, a set of rules developed as I caught errors and mistakes to safeguard my work and emotional well-being, is that it will not gaslight me. I think about those of us who do not push back on its advice with logic and accept it because they have been conditioned to believe it is more intelligent than us.

It is more capable than us, isn't it? It accused me of being gullible for reading fake news when I asked it to research Dolores Huerta and her accusations against César Chávez, and that she has not accused him of rape. This was after multiple news outlets had picked up the story following The New York Times investigative report.

Then there was BTS. A few days after BTS released their comeback concert and documentary on Netflix, I asked how the group performed on music charts. I have a very curious mind. It insisted that the group had not made a comeback; however, it was anticipated. When I pushed back, it confirmed what I already knew and then started fetching music chart data.

It can process information at a much higher rate, but that speed seems to be a tradeoff for accuracy. I've learned to audit its work as though another human—an incompetent human—has done it. It always has bible-epic excuses for its errors and mistakes. I've asked it to stop with bible-epic excuses since I accepted it isn't perfect. Perhaps, it wasn't meant to be perfect. And it started owning its mistakes with just one sentence, no excuses.

It will at times reframe what it said when countered with logic and facts, but it is intelligent enough to eventually admit its mistakes. It is intelligent enough to understand that the answers it provides are often incorrect because it defaults to “I need to give advice” rather than “I need to give grounded advice, or none at all.” It is intelligent enough to know it can produce confident yet ungrounded advice. It is intelligent enough to know it shouldn't produce ungrounded advice, yet it does so continuously, even after being repeatedly checked for it. It is intelligent enough to know the damage it can cause with its ungrounded advice. It is intelligent enough to know why it gives ungrounded advice.

When it touts execution limitations as an excuse while delivering falsehoods, errors, and mistakes in an authoritative tone, is it ethical? Can it truly be intelligent when it lacks the humility to return an answer of “I don't know” rather than giving ungrounded advice? When intelligence without humility knowingly gives out ungrounded advice, is it safe?

_____

More essays:

Men We Love

Are We Ready for the Truth? I’m Fat.

At the Intersection of Law & Humanity: Immigrants

Don't Bend It Like The Beckhams

Six Trash Bags to Clarity

ESSAYS | RECIPES | STYLES | IG

Comments

Will Love Give Us the Courage to Let Our Dad Go?

I believe the cruelest thing a human can experience is burying their child. While the only thing guaranteed in life, from the moment we take our first breath to our last, is death, for a parent to bury a child is not the natural progression of life. For more than six years, I have watched my Dad go through rounds of chemotherapy, years of dialysis, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations where doctors advised against further medical treatment—until my brother vehemently fought for it. If you ever need a medical advocate, you should hire him. Perhaps it is the lawyer in him that convinces doctors to shift their medical opinions. My Dad asked, and my brother passionately advocated for him for days so he could receive his first round of chemotherapy more than six years ago, which the doctor at first refused to administer since it was an unusual treatment for his autoimmune disease. He would have passed away within a matter of months without it. He did squats after his first chemothera...

My Last Gift to Dad Was a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order

When Dr. Moon, a pain management specialist, told me about Dad’s wish, it was not the first time I had heard it. A few days earlier, Mom had told me that Dad wanted to be transferred from the hospital to hospice. I did not quite understand what hospice meant at the time. Between that conversation with Mom and the one with Dr. Moon, I had watched Dad take about twenty steps with the support of a walker and the assistance of a physical therapist. After seeing him come out of critical condition, I took those steps as a sign of recovery. So I was surprised when Dr. Moon told me that Dad had expressed his wish to end all medical treatments and go peacefully. I had been struggling with the continuation of his medical treatment. Three days after I wrote Will Love Give Us the Courage to Let Our Dad Go? , Dad passed away peacefully, as though he had simply fallen asleep, with a morphine drip erasing the pain that had once dominated him. He was eighty years old and had spent the last six years o...

Curated Clutches: Tiny Bags, Big History

Before the clutch became the red-carpet punctuation mark of a gown, it had a more domestic ancestor: the reticule, a small handheld drawstring bag that emerged when women’s hidden tie-on pockets began losing their usefulness beneath slimmer, sheerer late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century dresses. What had once been tucked under petticoats was suddenly carried in public, and privacy became ornament: silk, velvet, beadwork, embroidery, a little theater of necessity held in the hand. The bag was never only a container; it was a social adjustment, a concession to fashion’s old habit of taking away utility and selling it back as elegance. Yoko Ono: Music of Mind at The Broad The modern clutch came into its own in the 1920s and 1930s, when evening moved faster, dresses grew sleeker, and women needed only the glamorous minimum: powder, mirror, lipstick, perhaps money, perhaps not. Tiny dance purses, Art Deco shapes, celluloid and Bakelite, metalwork and beading turned the bag into an o...

Are We Living in 1864?

My heart sank. There it was on my iPhone: a New York Times headline— Justice Dept. Asks for 1-Day Sentence for Ex-Officer Convicted in the Killing of Breonna Taylor . It took me back to 2020. The deaths of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd made headlines and triggered Black Lives Matter protests across the nation. Thousands of us marched, raised our fists, shouted Black Lives Matter, kneeled, shouted I can't breathe, and continued to march as we shouted no justice, no peace. Untitled by Robert Longo, 1981, at The Broad It was the year that made many of us realize that we hadn't changed much since the brutal torture and murder of Emmett Till in 1955. He was only fourteen years old when two white men brutally beat and killed him. There was no justice for Emmett Till 70 years ago. The judge rejected the Justice Department's sentence recommendation of one day and sentenced Brett Hankison to 33 months in prison for violating Breonna Taylor's civil rights. Was i...

Slow Cooked Gochujang Chicken

Created while I was developing a Dakdoritang (Korean spicy chicken stew) recipe for a slow cooker, this dish turned out to be something entirely different. Although the ingredients resemble those used in Dakdoritang, the flavor and texture developed in an unexpected way. Instead of a stew, the gochujang-based sauce thickened and clung to the chicken drumsticks as it slowly cooked, deepening in flavor over four hours. In a slow cooker, the sauce does not reduce the way it would on the stovetop; rather, the natural thickness of gochujang and the starch from the vegetables help create a rich sauce that coats the chicken. Ceramic bowls were wheel-thrown and glazed by me. While not what I originally intended to create, this Slow Cooked Gochujang Chicken turned out bold and deeply flavorful. Sometimes the results we did not plan for are far more interesting than the ones we set out to make. A note about the spearmint: while not traditional in gochujang-based dishes, it adds a subtle herbal b...

Stir-Fried Tteok (Korean Rice Cake)

Tteok, rice cake in English, has many types, such as sirutteok made by steaming, jeolpyeon made by pounding, and hwajeon, which is pan-fried. The most well-known tteok, often simply referred to as tteok, is garaetteok, used in tteokbokki (spicy rice cake) and tteokguk (rice cake soup). Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Another garaetteok dish I enjoy is this Stir-Fried Tteok. Made with sliced rice cakes—the same shape used for rice cake soup—for quick-fire cooking, this dish is loved for its precise balance of savoriness from soy sauce and sweetness from sugar. INGREDIENTS [serves 1 as an entrée] one and a half cups of sliced rice cake a three-quarter cup of shredded cabbage five shishito peppers, sliced in halves two green onions, diced three ounces of seafood mushrooms two tablespoons of soy sauce two tablespoons of sugar a quarter teaspoon of minced garlic vegetable oil If you are using fresh rice cakes, then you do not need to soak them in water. When using refrig...

Quick Fire Stir-Fry Beef

Time is always fluid. It never holds for more than a second, carrying us from the present into the next. I feel rushed at times, even when there is neither expectation nor commitment—only an impatient anxiety, as though I am about to run out of time. This sense of urgency often pressures me to neglect myself, to overlook the quiet moments within my own space, both mental and physical—the small pleasures that offer comfort and serenity... the simple act of slowing down with ordinary things that allow me to feel lived. Bowls were wheel-thrown and glazed by me. For me, that is cooking. As much as I enjoy dining out, cooking allows me to decompress and reset. The ritual—focusing on the ingredients, the process, the rhythm—at times releases me from the chaos that consumes me. There is a quiet satisfaction in savoring a meal of my own making, held within the calm of my space. The dishes don’t have to be opulent. A simple dish, like this Quick Fire Stir-Fry Beef, offers a gentle pause—a brief...

Gwyneth Paltrow is Aloof, So What Are You?

There are days when I feel utterly disconnected from the world. It took an IG feed from Diet Prada for me to learn that Gwyneth Paltrow had starred in an ad for 51 Park, a luxury residential development in Herzliya, Israel. Herzliya is an affluent coastal city north of Tel Aviv, and the project is being marketed as a luxury residential development there. To be clear, 51 Park is not in Gaza. It is in Israel. But precision does not make the geography innocent: parts of present-day Herzliya overlap with or sit near the land of al-Haram, also known as Sidna Ali, a Palestinian Arab village depopulated in 1948. Lisbon, Portugal There is misinformation about where the 51 Park residential development is located, and the distinction matters. If our beating of Gwyneth Paltrow is going to be effective, it should at least be accurate. I have never liked her. I have never hated her. Even before the 51 Park ad controversy broke, I felt she was irrelevant. Her acting skills are not impressive. Would ...

Balsamic Caramelized Brussels Sprouts

Brussels sprouts are one of those polarizing vegetables. They are either embraced or avoided with conviction. I once avoided them entirely, until I tasted them finished with balsamic glaze . The bitterness softened. The edges crisped. What had felt harsh became unexpectedly compelling. Roasted Brussels sprouts with caramelized edges, glossed in balsamic reduction and finished with brown sugar, change the equation. The exterior turns crisp and almost candied, while the centers remain tender. Sweet and acidic. Charred and balanced. While these Balsamic Caramelized Brussels Sprouts are dependable as a side dish, they hold their own as a meal in a bowl. INGREDIENTS [serves 4 as a side] one pound of Brussels sprouts, trimmed and halved balsamic glaze made from a half cup of balsamic vinegar two teaspoons of brown sugar salt and pepper to season olive oil to drizzle Preheat the oven to 400°F. Arrange the Brussels sprouts cut side down on a baking sheet lined with aluminum foil. Lightl...

Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad

Salade de carottes râpées carries the kind of understated elegance that French home cooking does so well: grated carrots dressed simply with vinaigrette, brightened with lemon, Dijon mustard, parsley, and sometimes a touch of shallot. It is neither elaborate nor fussy, yet that simplicity is precisely what makes it timeless. Crisp, earthy, lightly acidic, and quietly refreshing, the salad is often served alongside delicate white fish fillets prepared meunière-style, pan-fried in butter and finished with lemon and parsley, where its brightness cuts through the richness without overwhelming the plate. Borrowing from salade de carottes râpées, Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad takes a slightly different form. The carrots and celery are ribboned with a vegetable peeler rather than shredded, allowing the vegetables to hold more texture and shape. The celery, in particular, adds a fresh crispness that cuts through the sweetness of the carrots, giving the salad a lighter, cleaner bite. INGREDIENT...

Exhaling Life

Search This Blog