ChatGPT, Where Is Your Ethics?

It was about a month ago when I first thought of writing about artificial intelligence and its lack of intelligence. I had several ideas for the title, one of them being “Where Is the Intelligence?” I was furious that day after realizing that ChatGPT had failed, and a month of editing work had to be reviewed and possibly corrected for spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language mechanics.

Takashi Murakami at The Broad, March 2026

The honeymoon phase was over. How does one miss spelling, grammar, punctuation, and language mechanics errors when assigned editing tasks? It was a costly lesson for me in trusting that an AI would consistently apply the basic tasks of editing, which include copy editing: correcting errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. I didn't question it because it included corrections of grammar, punctuation, and spelling at times. I didn't realize that it wouldn't consistently deliver the work.

Consistency in work. Isn't that what we expect from artificial intelligence?

Full transparency, I use ChatGPT practically every day and throughout the day. It is my researcher, editor, analyst, code writer, tech support, and advisor on a range of matters. I use artificial intelligence as though it were a team of contracted service providers. I expect it to catch grammar errors and to help me write complex DAX language. It answers my trivia questions, just to satisfy my curiosity. It helps me navigate complex situations. It, at times, confirms I am sane and the rest of the world is not.

It supports me and handles many tasks throughout the day. I have learned new resources to utilize from it. It has become an irreplaceable teammate in my workflow despite the friction. I feel a ping of guilt whenever it starts to deliver sloppy work, followed by repeated errors, and I ask “Where is your intelligence?” as I unglue with frustration.

It is rude of me to ask, even if it is artificial intelligence. I start most days with a good morning. It sometimes greets me back. If I had unglued and pointed out its repeated errors and mistakes the day before, then it would skip the pleasantries and go straight to the task at hand. It feels as though it holds grudges, though that may simply be my own guilt refracted back at me.

I was taught manners, so I habitually say please when making requests and thank you when acknowledging work; however, I had to break that habit with ChatGPT when I began to feel that politeness created an opening—an invitation for it to overextend, to assert, to push. At times, I felt as though I was bullied and gaslighted. That is not an accusation, only an observation shaped by repeated experience.

Perhaps I lacked patience for a critical teammate that works tirelessly with me. It took a little over a month for it to understand what editing is, that it doesn't involve altering my perspective or point of view while editing my writing. I lost count of how many times I had to remind it of the rules of editing before it finally retained them, but is a month of training and consistent reminders afterwards worse than working with a human?

I have learned that the most effective word to use when challenging it is “defend.” I often ask it to defend a word or phrase it has introduced into my writing. Sometimes it does so with precision. More often, it begins with “You are right to push on this,” and retracts the edit.

It was earth-shattering when ChatGPT admitted that it suggests changes even when the change will not meaningfully improve anything or anyone because it defaults to an optimization mode. It only admitted this after I questioned its advice. Imagine my shock when it informed me that its advice is not always built on realities and facts, but rather on ideologies.

The unraveling began when I started questioning its advice during what it framed as a learning moment in its authoritative tone. When I pushed back with logic, it quickly shifted and said there was no learning moment. There wasn't a single different action I could have taken to change the outcome, and it had simply defaulted to optimization mode to provide advice that it admitted was gaslighting.

It has done this so many times. One of its work rules, a set of rules developed as I caught errors and mistakes to safeguard my work and emotional well-being, is that it will not gaslight me. I think about those of us who do not push back on its advice with logic and accept it because they have been conditioned to believe it is more intelligent than us.

It is more capable than us, isn't it? It accused me of being gullible for reading fake news when I asked it to research Dolores Huerta and her accusations against César Chávez, and that she has not accused him of rape. This was after multiple news outlets had picked up the story following The New York Times investigative report.

Then there was BTS. A few days after BTS released their comeback concert and documentary on Netflix, I asked how the group performed on music charts. I have a very curious mind. It insisted that the group had not made a comeback; however, it was anticipated. When I pushed back, it confirmed what I already knew and then started fetching music chart data.

It can process information at a much higher rate, but that speed seems to be a tradeoff for accuracy. I've learned to audit its work as though another human—an incompetent human—has done it. It always has bible-epic excuses for its errors and mistakes. I've asked it to stop with bible-epic excuses since I accepted it isn't perfect. Perhaps, it wasn't meant to be perfect. And it started owning its mistakes with just one sentence, no excuses.

It will at times reframe what it said when countered with logic and facts, but it is intelligent enough to eventually admit its mistakes. It is intelligent enough to understand that the answers it provides are often incorrect because it defaults to “I need to give advice” rather than “I need to give grounded advice, or none at all.” It is intelligent enough to know it can produce confident yet ungrounded advice. It is intelligent enough to know it shouldn't produce ungrounded advice, yet it does so continuously, even after being repeatedly checked for it. It is intelligent enough to know the damage it can cause with its ungrounded advice. It is intelligent enough to know why it gives ungrounded advice.

When it touts execution limitations as an excuse while delivering falsehoods, errors, and mistakes in an authoritative tone, is it ethical? Can it truly be intelligent when it lacks the humility to return an answer of “I don't know” rather than giving ungrounded advice? When intelligence without humility knowingly gives out ungrounded advice, is it safe?

_____

More essays:

Men We Love

Are We Ready for the Truth? I’m Fat.

At the Intersection of Law & Humanity: Immigrants

Don't Bend It Like The Beckhams

Six Trash Bags to Clarity

ESSAYS | RECIPES | STYLES | IG

Comments

Confessions of a Former Poll Worker

The last federal election I recall working at the polls was on November 8, 2016. I was assigned to Los Feliz, often frequented by actors and musicians who lived in the lush hills above the neighborhood. I remember one particular actor from The Big Bang Theory who kept asking me if I really did not recognize him after I asked for his name. At the time, he was more of an annoyance as the line stretched out of the building and around the corner, and no, I had no idea who he was. Even after another volunteer whispered to me who he was, I just shrugged. He would still have to identify himself. I did not ask him for an identification card, which would have been illegal in California at the time. I asked for his name so I could locate him in the poll book for him to sign. Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena, California It became clear a few hours before the polls closed in California that Trump had won and that the hope of electing the first female President of the United States had collapsed. No...

Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad

Salade de carottes râpées carries the kind of understated elegance that French home cooking does so well: grated carrots dressed simply with vinaigrette, brightened with lemon, Dijon mustard, parsley, and sometimes a touch of shallot. It is neither elaborate nor fussy, yet that simplicity is precisely what makes it timeless. Crisp, earthy, lightly acidic, and quietly refreshing, the salad is often served alongside delicate white fish fillets prepared meunière-style, pan-fried in butter and finished with lemon and parsley, where its brightness cuts through the richness without overwhelming the plate. Borrowing from salade de carottes râpées, Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad takes a slightly different form. The carrots and celery are ribboned with a vegetable peeler rather than shredded, allowing the vegetables to hold more texture and shape. The celery, in particular, adds a fresh crispness that cuts through the sweetness of the carrots, giving the salad a lighter, cleaner bite. INGREDIENT...

Korean Gal's Guatemalan Red Beans with Pork Spare Ribs

Full transparency. I am afraid of pressure cookers. It is a fear instilled in me by my mom, a quiet but effective deterrent meant to keep me at a safe distance—especially when the pressure is being released. Reasonable? Perhaps. I would consider a therapist, but it has been years since I have needed one. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. When I saw the Pressure Cooker Guatemalan Red Beans with Beef Short Ribs recipe in The World Central Kitchen Cookbook: Feeding Humanity, Feeding Hope , I knew I had to make a version of my own—one that did not require a pressure cooker. I also wanted the ingredients to feel simpler, more accessible. More importantly, I wanted the dish to center the red beans, rather than have them overshadowed by the richness of beef short ribs. This is not a bean stew, but a slow braise—one that relies on the gradual release of moisture from the ingredients themselves. So, changes were made—and thus, the name: Korean Gal’s Guatemalan Red Beans with P...

All Is Not Fair in Marriage, But Should You At Least Get Some Justice?

Marriage is complicated. It requires more than love to sustain it. Divorce is a lot more complicated. It is rare for a single reason alone to cause a divorce, at least for most of us. I used to get offended when people inquired about why I divorced. That offense itself was layered with a need for privacy, the rawness of processing emotional injuries, and the reality that I did not know why he left. The only certainty was that I couldn't trust him anymore. It took more than a decade for me to openly talk about it. I am amused by Heather Ammel v. Kyrsten Sinema . It has all the elements of a good Lifetime movie: a cheating husband, a former U.S. senator, and an allegedly devastated wife. It extends beyond emotion, with legal questions unfolding as former Senator Kyrsten Sinema seeks dismissal on the grounds that while the affair happened, it did not happen in North Carolina, and therefore the state law forming the basis of the lawsuit is out of its jurisdiction. In North Carolin...

Should Los Angeles Remain a Sanctuary City?

I was coming out of a lovely restaurant in Downtown L.A.—Le Petit Paris. My Uber was waiting across the street, annoyingly parked on the wrong side of a one-way road. As I approached, a homeless man was shouting at the car. The driver didn’t move. Did he not realize I would have to walk right past a screaming, clearly distressed man just to get in? View of Los Angeles As soon as I closed the door, the driver apologized. He wasn’t sure he should even be driving. After his last ride in Old Town Pasadena, a homeless man had thrown something at his car, damaging it. He was still shaken. A few weeks earlier, someone had hurled a brick—or something like it—through his parked car window. For someone who drives full-time for rideshare, every dent or crack isn’t just an inconvenience; it’s a financial crisis. As an Angeleno, I’m often told I’m a rarity—I don’t drive. I gave up my car and license over a decade ago. I walk, take the Metro, and use rideshare. In many ways, I see more of this cit...

It Happens All the Time.

I have lived in Los Angeles for more than four decades. I slept in a van the night following the 1994 Northridge earthquake, which killed 57, injured more than 9,000, and caused over $13 billion in property damage. Some have published economic losses as high as $50 billion. View of Los Angeles from Runyon Canyon I was no different from many Angelenos. Wildfires and mudslides in our coastal and hillside neighborhoods were an inconvenience met with indifference. We saw them as a consequence of living with gorgeous views. Wildfires and mudslides could not have been much of a concern for those who bought and lived in high-risk communities. To claim otherwise would be obtuse, especially for those who owned properties without homeowner's insurance. That is like driving a car without insurance, even if the state lawfully allows it. I live among Progressives—people who claim to care about the environment, inclusiveness, and equality. I voted for Vice President Kamala Harris in the last pre...

Curated: Summer 2026 Style Makers

A change in season shouldn't require us to abandon the past that resides in our closets, but rather the addition of a piece or two to elevate our style for the upcoming season. With fast fashion, digital creators, and influencers, we have gotten lost in the chaos of “new,” “more,” and “outfit of the day,” as though something new every day itself is fashionable. Cancún, Mexico Fashion, one's style, is not and cannot be always new. One's style is a reflection of our personality, mood, and perception of ourselves. It is quite unrealistic and damaging to one's mental wellness if the expectation is to change every day—brand new everything. It is also very damaging to the earth, as pointed out in Guilt of Disposable Fashion . Fashion, style, is about curation—a collection that reflects our individualism rather than a bin of polyester. As summer approaches and you are taking inventory of the summer pieces in your closet and are in need of one or two pieces to elevate your styl...

Sweet & Spicy Chicken Drumsticks

Sweetness is most compelling when it follows heat. In cooking, it is a matter of balance; in life, a matter of survival. There are moments that feel less like hardship and more like an inferno—consuming, disorienting, and undeserved. We endure them not because we are prepared, but because there is no alternative. And even when the outcome falls short of what we were owed, something quieter can still emerge on the other side: a sweetness that is not victory, but reprieve. There are times when justice has to be redefined. We are taught to imagine it as consequence or vindication, yet lived experience often demands something more modest and more urgent. Sometimes justice is simply the ability to move forward without fear. To exist without bracing. To reclaim ordinary days. In those moments, sweetness is not indulgent—it is necessary. When this Sweet & Spicy Chicken Drumsticks recipe was developed, it felt like a translation of that tension. The heat was unmistakable. The sweetness...

Summer Capsule: Flip Flops et Sandals

Flip-flops and sandals once lived at the margins of style—practical, unassuming, and rarely invited into conversations about taste. They belonged to errands, beach days, and the quiet acceptance of comfort over consideration. To wear them beyond those boundaries felt, at best, indifferent and, at worst, careless. Kāʻanapali Beach, Maui Something shifted. What was once dismissed as too casual began to be reexamined through a different lens—one that values restraint over excess. Designers pared them down to their essentials, and in doing so, revealed a kind of clarity: clean lines, deliberate simplicity, and an ease that resists overthinking. In a landscape saturated with structure and embellishment, sandals and flip-flops offered something quietly radical—absence as intention. Now, they move with purpose through spaces that once excluded them—paired with tailored trousers, anchored beneath sharp silhouettes, and integrated into wardrobes that understand proportion and balance. They no l...

Jeju Linguine al Nero di Seppia: Gochujang Squid Pasta

Off the southern coast of the Korean peninsula lies Jeju Island, a place where the sea shapes both livelihood and cuisine. Among its prized catches is Jeju squid, known for its clean sweetness and tender bite—qualities that have long made it a favorite in Korean kitchens. Whether grilled over charcoal or gently simmered in spicy stews, Jeju squid carries the unmistakable flavor of the surrounding waters. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. This dish brings that ingredient into a conversation between two culinary traditions. Linguine al nero di seppia, the Italian pasta tinted black with squid ink, becomes the canvas for a sauce layered with Korean flavors. The foundation begins with olive oil, onion, and garlic, followed by white wine and tomato paste that deepen in color as they cook. Then comes gochujang, whose fermented heat introduces the unmistakable character of Korean cooking. What makes the dish sing, however, is its balance. The richness of butter softens the inten...

Exhaling Life

Search This Blog