Skip to main content

At the Intersection of Law & Humanity: Immigrants

Americans who believe in enforcement are not automatically endorsing cruelty.
Americans who believe in compassion are not automatically rejecting the rule of law as it applies to all of us.

Paint Cans, 1990, Wayne Thiebaud, SFMoMA

Yet in our current climate, those positions are treated as mutually exclusive. Immigration, perhaps more than any other issue, has become the stage on which we rehearse our all-or-nothing instincts.

I am Korean American. I carry my U.S. passport card with me everywhere I go. Some of you already know that. It has quietly become my default form of identification. I did not wait for a second inauguration to begin doing that. The election itself was enough.

My parents waited years for lawful permanent residency before we immigrated to the United States. I became a citizen after I turned eighteen. I identify as Korean, a heritage I am immensely proud of. I am also a citizen of the United States. An American. It is simple. It is also complex.


I believe a sovereign nation has the right to enforce its immigration laws. I also believe that how those laws are enforced matters. When enforcement feels opaque, when agents are masked, when identification is unclear, when communities cannot easily distinguish between lawful authority and intimidation, trust erodes quickly. A nation can insist on the rule of law without surrendering its commitment to human dignity.

What unsettles me most is not that we disagree about immigration. It is that we no longer acknowledge its complexity. Legal status, asylum claims, temporary protections, and final orders of removal are not interchangeable categories. Yet public discourse flattens them into a single word: immigrant. From there, it becomes easy to flatten the people inside those categories as well.

When we talk about immigrants, we cannot focus only on humanity. We must also acknowledge that this nation has immigration laws. We insist that the rule of law be applied to immigrants. Then should we not also expect, not as a legal technicality but as a matter of social order, that individuals comply with lawful court orders once legal avenues have been exhausted, including final orders of removal?

If we expect the government to comply with lawful court orders issued yesterday, then we should also expect that an individual follow a lawful court order issued years ago after those legal processes have concluded. The rule of law cannot function as a one-directional expectation. Individuals must obey lawful orders, even when they are painful. And the government must obey lawful limits.


So here we are with Ms. Any Lucia Lopez Belloza.

Her family sought asylum when she was a child. That asylum claim was denied. In March 2016, an immigration judge issued a final order of removal. In February 2017, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the appeal. That was the final administrative step. These decisions occurred before Donald Trump re-entered the White House.

More than eight years later, in November 2025, Ms. Lopez Belloza was detained at Boston Logan International Airport while attempting to travel home for Thanksgiving. A federal court issued an order prohibiting her removal from Massachusetts or the United States. She was deported to Honduras two days later despite that order. The government later acknowledged in court that her removal was an error, though it argued that the mistake did not alter the underlying removal order.

The timeline matters.

The initial removal order was not new. The court order blocking her deportation was not ambiguous. Both existed. Both carried legal authority.


On February 13, the court ordered the return of Ms. Lopez Belloza. That order does not grant her a lawful visa to remain in the United States. It does not automatically reopen her case. It does not guarantee that she will return to school or to her family without consequence. It simply requires the government to correct its failure to comply with an earlier judicial directive. She may still face detention upon return if the government follows through on its position.

The government can argue that she had opportunities to appeal, years in fact. She entered as a child. In my opinion, she should be allowed to remain in the United States. That belief is not rooted in legality. It is rooted in humanity. Are we prepared to suspend lawful finality in this case?

The rule of law is not simply that laws exist. For it to function, it requires predictable enforcement, neutral application, courts that matter, executive compliance, and citizens who accept lawful outcomes even when they are uncomfortable. If final judgments are routinely left unexecuted or indefinitely deferred and society grows accustomed to that reality, enforcement becomes arbitrary. Has that already happened in our immigration system?

Do we believe in the rule of law, or do we believe in it only when it serves our sympathies?

_____
More essays:

ESSAYS | RECIPES | STYLES | IG

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Curated Clutches: Tiny Bags, Big History

Before the clutch became the red-carpet punctuation mark of a gown, it had a more domestic ancestor: the reticule, a small handheld drawstring bag that emerged when women’s hidden tie-on pockets began losing their usefulness beneath slimmer, sheerer late-eighteenth- and early-nineteenth-century dresses. What had once been tucked under petticoats was suddenly carried in public, and privacy became ornament: silk, velvet, beadwork, embroidery, a little theater of necessity held in the hand. The bag was never only a container; it was a social adjustment, a concession to fashion’s old habit of taking away utility and selling it back as elegance. Yoko Ono: Music of Mind at The Broad The modern clutch came into its own in the 1920s and 1930s, when evening moved faster, dresses grew sleeker, and women needed only the glamorous minimum: powder, mirror, lipstick, perhaps money, perhaps not. Tiny dance purses, Art Deco shapes, celluloid and Bakelite, metalwork and beading turned the bag into an o...

Will Love Give Us the Courage to Let Our Dad Go?

I believe the cruelest thing a human can experience is burying their child. While the only thing guaranteed in life, from the moment we take our first breath to our last, is death, for a parent to bury a child is not the natural progression of life. For more than six years, I have watched my Dad go through rounds of chemotherapy, years of dialysis, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations where doctors advised against further medical treatment—until my brother vehemently fought for it. If you ever need a medical advocate, you should hire him. Perhaps it is the lawyer in him that convinces doctors to shift their medical opinions. My Dad asked, and my brother passionately advocated for him for days so he could receive his first round of chemotherapy more than six years ago, which the doctor at first refused to administer since it was an unusual treatment for his autoimmune disease. He would have passed away within a matter of months without it. He did squats after his first chemothera...

My Last Gift to Dad Was a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order

When Dr. Moon, a pain management specialist, told me about Dad’s wish, it was not the first time I had heard it. A few days earlier, Mom had told me that Dad wanted to be transferred from the hospital to hospice. I did not quite understand what hospice meant at the time. Between that conversation with Mom and the one with Dr. Moon, I had watched Dad take about twenty steps with the support of a walker and the assistance of a physical therapist. After seeing him come out of critical condition, I took those steps as a sign of recovery. So I was surprised when Dr. Moon told me that Dad had expressed his wish to end all medical treatments and go peacefully. I had been struggling with the continuation of his medical treatment. Three days after I wrote Will Love Give Us the Courage to Let Our Dad Go? , Dad passed away peacefully, as though he had simply fallen asleep, with a morphine drip erasing the pain that had once dominated him. He was eighty years old and had spent the last six years o...

Ham Bone Soup

There is a particular pleasure in cooking after the holiday table has been cleared. The ham has been carved, served, admired. What remains — the bone, the fragments, the quiet excess — is where the real work begins. I look forward to leftovers more than the centerpiece itself. A ham bone tucked into the freezer feels less like scraps and more like promise. It becomes Ham Fried Rice on one day and, on another, a pot of Ham Bone Soup that simmers slowly and steadies the house. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me This is not a flashy soup. It is structural. Broth deepened by marrow. Aromatics softened into submission. Bits of ham returning to the pot that first rendered them tender. It is economical without feeling spare, practical without being austere. INGREDIENTS [serves 2–3 as a main] one leftover ham bone with bits of ham on it one cup of leftover ham, diced twenty ounces of oxtail broth fifteen ounces of chicken bone broth ten ounces of water five celery stalks, sliced ...

Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad

Salade de carottes râpées carries the kind of understated elegance that French home cooking does so well: grated carrots dressed simply with vinaigrette, brightened with lemon, Dijon mustard, parsley, and sometimes a touch of shallot. It is neither elaborate nor fussy, yet that simplicity is precisely what makes it timeless. Crisp, earthy, lightly acidic, and quietly refreshing, the salad is often served alongside delicate white fish fillets prepared meunière-style, pan-fried in butter and finished with lemon and parsley, where its brightness cuts through the richness without overwhelming the plate. Borrowing from salade de carottes râpées, Carrot et Celery Ribbon Salad takes a slightly different form. The carrots and celery are ribboned with a vegetable peeler rather than shredded, allowing the vegetables to hold more texture and shape. The celery, in particular, adds a fresh crispness that cuts through the sweetness of the carrots, giving the salad a lighter, cleaner bite. INGREDIENT...

Piquant Salmon with Ginger and Lemon

Did you know that salmon is packed with health benefits? It is a great source of omega-3 fatty acids, a heart-healthy fat known to reduce inflammation and support brain health. Salmon is also rich in vitamin B-12, which helps produce red blood cells and supports the health of the central nervous system. Although I am not a health-conscious eater — and you would probably know that if you followed me on Instagram — it is still nice to know that one of the easiest fish to cook is also packed with nutrients. Named piquant for the bright flavors of ginger and lemon, this salmon dish pairs beautifully with sautéed spinach and rice pilaf. INGREDIENTS [serves 1 as a main dish] six-ounce salmon fillet with skin a tablespoon of diced ginger a tablespoon of lemon juice a tablespoon of white wine a tablespoon of unsalted butter a three-quarters tablespoon of olive oil a three-quarters teaspoon of diced chives a half teaspoon of thyme an eighth teaspoon of sea salt freshly cracked pepper Mix dice...

Gwyneth Paltrow is Aloof, So What Are You?

There are days when I feel utterly disconnected from the world. It took an IG feed from Diet Prada for me to learn that Gwyneth Paltrow had starred in an ad for 51 Park, a luxury residential development in Herzliya, Israel. Herzliya is an affluent coastal city north of Tel Aviv, and the project is being marketed as a luxury residential development there. To be clear, 51 Park is not in Gaza. It is in Israel. But precision does not make the geography innocent: parts of present-day Herzliya overlap with or sit near the land of al-Haram, also known as Sidna Ali, a Palestinian Arab village depopulated in 1948. Lisbon, Portugal There is misinformation about where the 51 Park residential development is located, and the distinction matters. If our beating of Gwyneth Paltrow is going to be effective, it should at least be accurate. I have never liked her. I have never hated her. Even before the 51 Park ad controversy broke, I felt she was irrelevant. Her acting skills are not impressive. Would ...

Stir-Fried Tteok (Korean Rice Cake)

Tteok, rice cake in English, has many types, such as sirutteok made by steaming, jeolpyeon made by pounding, and hwajeon, which is pan-fried. The most well-known tteok, often simply referred to as tteok, is garaetteok, used in tteokbokki (spicy rice cake) and tteokguk (rice cake soup). Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Another garaetteok dish I enjoy is this Stir-Fried Tteok. Made with sliced rice cakes—the same shape used for rice cake soup—for quick-fire cooking, this dish is loved for its precise balance of savoriness from soy sauce and sweetness from sugar. INGREDIENTS [serves 1 as an entrée] one and a half cups of sliced rice cake a three-quarter cup of shredded cabbage five shishito peppers, sliced in halves two green onions, diced three ounces of seafood mushrooms two tablespoons of soy sauce two tablespoons of sugar a quarter teaspoon of minced garlic vegetable oil If you are using fresh rice cakes, then you do not need to soak them in water. When using refrig...

Lime et Elephant Garlic Flower Shrimp

One of my favorite Sunday rituals is a slow walk through the Hollywood Farmers Market. It’s one of the largest in the area, expansive without feeling overwhelming, and a reliable place to stumble onto ingredients you didn’t know you were looking for. On a recent visit, I stopped at a garlic and onion farmer’s stand and found myself drawn to a bundle of elephant garlic flowers—tall, architectural, and unexpectedly delicate. I brought them home partly to live on the kitchen counter for a few days, and partly to see what they could do in a pan. Garlic, after all, has always had an easy affinity with shrimp. Lime followed naturally. The result is this dish: quick, aromatic, and bright, with just enough heat to keep things alert. INGREDIENTS [serves 3 to 4 as a main course] one pound of shrimp, peeled and deveined two limes two tablespoons of brown sugar one stem of elephant garlic flower, petals only two garlic cloves, sliced a half teaspoon of crushed red chili flakes two Korean ...

I Hate That Word… Survivor

Decades have passed, but what happened still lives in me. The fear and shame do not feel historical. They feel present. Sometimes the anger surfaces without warning. I am angry that it happened to me. I was sexually abused as a young girl for quite some time. By the time I told my parents, it had already stopped. Years had passed. I was told never to tell anyone else because it would ruin the abuser’s life. That instruction damaged me in ways I still struggle to forgive. I walk a narrow line between love and resentment. I love my parents. I also resent them. Sometimes that resentment shows itself as indifference. I hate that word… survivor. Simply put, I haven’t survived it. Photo by Paul Kapischka on Unsplash It has been nearly three decades since my first suicide attempt. My parents ensured I would not receive psychiatric treatment at that time. Nearly two decades later came the second attempt, followed by a diagnosis of severe depression. There were more attempts. Intensive Car...