Skip to main content

At the Intersection of Law & Humanity: Immigrants

Americans who believe in enforcement are not automatically endorsing cruelty.
Americans who believe in compassion are not automatically rejecting the rule of law as it applies to all of us.

Paint Cans, 1990, Wayne Thiebaud, SFMoMA

Yet in our current climate, those positions are treated as mutually exclusive. Immigration, perhaps more than any other issue, has become the stage on which we rehearse our all-or-nothing instincts.

I am Korean American. I carry my U.S. passport card with me everywhere I go. Some of you already know that. It has quietly become my default form of identification. I did not wait for a second inauguration to begin doing that. The election itself was enough.

My parents waited years for lawful permanent residency before we immigrated to the United States. I became a citizen after I turned eighteen. I identify as Korean, a heritage I am immensely proud of. I am also a citizen of the United States. An American. It is simple. It is also complex.


I believe a sovereign nation has the right to enforce its immigration laws. I also believe that how those laws are enforced matters. When enforcement feels opaque, when agents are masked, when identification is unclear, when communities cannot easily distinguish between lawful authority and intimidation, trust erodes quickly. A nation can insist on the rule of law without surrendering its commitment to human dignity.

What unsettles me most is not that we disagree about immigration. It is that we no longer acknowledge its complexity. Legal status, asylum claims, temporary protections, and final orders of removal are not interchangeable categories. Yet public discourse flattens them into a single word: immigrant. From there, it becomes easy to flatten the people inside those categories as well.

When we talk about immigrants, we cannot focus only on humanity. We must also acknowledge that this nation has immigration laws. We insist that the rule of law be applied to immigrants. Then should we not also expect, not as a legal technicality but as a matter of social order, that individuals comply with lawful court orders once legal avenues have been exhausted, including final orders of removal?

If we expect the government to comply with lawful court orders issued yesterday, then we should also expect that an individual follow a lawful court order issued years ago after those legal processes have concluded. The rule of law cannot function as a one-directional expectation. Individuals must obey lawful orders, even when they are painful. And the government must obey lawful limits.


So here we are with Ms. Any Lucia Lopez Belloza.

Her family sought asylum when she was a child. That asylum claim was denied. In March 2016, an immigration judge issued a final order of removal. In February 2017, the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed the appeal. That was the final administrative step. These decisions occurred before Donald Trump re-entered the White House.

More than eight years later, in November 2025, Ms. Lopez Belloza was detained at Boston Logan International Airport while attempting to travel home for Thanksgiving. A federal court issued an order prohibiting her removal from Massachusetts or the United States. She was deported to Honduras two days later despite that order. The government later acknowledged in court that her removal was an error, though it argued that the mistake did not alter the underlying removal order.

The timeline matters.

The initial removal order was not new. The court order blocking her deportation was not ambiguous. Both existed. Both carried legal authority.


On February 13, the court ordered the return of Ms. Lopez Belloza. That order does not grant her a lawful visa to remain in the United States. It does not automatically reopen her case. It does not guarantee that she will return to school or to her family without consequence. It simply requires the government to correct its failure to comply with an earlier judicial directive. She may still face detention upon return if the government follows through on its position.

The government can argue that she had opportunities to appeal, years in fact. She entered as a child. In my opinion, she should be allowed to remain in the United States. That belief is not rooted in legality. It is rooted in humanity. Are we prepared to suspend lawful finality in this case?

The rule of law is not simply that laws exist. For it to function, it requires predictable enforcement, neutral application, courts that matter, executive compliance, and citizens who accept lawful outcomes even when they are uncomfortable. If final judgments are routinely left unexecuted or indefinitely deferred and society grows accustomed to that reality, enforcement becomes arbitrary. Has that already happened in our immigration system?

Do we believe in the rule of law, or do we believe in it only when it serves our sympathies?

_____
More essays:

ESSAYS | RECIPES | STYLES | IG

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Newsom's Affair: Somewhere Between His & Her Stories

Did Ruby Rippey lose her voice twenty years ago, as she suggests in her Vanity Fair essay, when her affair with then San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom exploded into public scandal, or did she simply have no defense to offer at the time? Perhaps Kamala Harris’s advice that she remain silent was not merely counsel to let time provide clearer perspective, but the advice of an attorney who understood that no arrangement of words could defend what Rippey had done to Alex Tourk, her husband at the time. By Pablo Picasso at LACMA For the record, I have said before that I will never vote for Gavin Newsom. My opinion of him is exceptionally low. So none of what follows should be mistaken for a dispatch from Team Newsom. It was not until I read Rippey’s essay that I learned of Newsom’s affair with her. From it, I learned that she worked for him. What elevated the story from garden-variety political infidelity to something approaching daytime-soap-opera tawdriness was that Rippey was married to Ne...

The Art of the Cold Shoulder

The shoulder has repeatedly been treated as one of fashion’s safest ways to be sensual. Most of us give Brigitte Bardot the credit for making the off-the-shoulder silhouette iconic—and certainly, few wore it with more persuasive nonchalance—but fashion history tells a far longer story. Recognizable versions of the neckline appear as far back as the 17th century, when European bodices widened and dipped low enough to reveal both the décolletage and shoulders. By the 19th century, the silhouette had become a fixture of evening dress. Queen Victoria herself wore a broad, shoulder-baring neckline for her 1840 wedding, and through the 1850s and 1860s, off-the-shoulder ball gowns paired tightly corseted bodices with sweeping skirts and bertha collars that framed exposed shoulders in lace, silk, and ruffles. Victorian modesty, it turns out, was considerably more situational than its reputation suggests. Calouste Gulbenkian Museum in Lisbon, Portugal The silhouette continued to surface as fash...

Oh Snap! BTS Just Made the Grammys Irrelevant

I am not ARMY. The first BTS member to intrigue me was J-Hope, who appeared last year on one of my favorite Korean shows, Chef & My Fridge, with his refrigerator in tow. There, I learned that he had performed at Le Gala des Pièces Jaunes at Paris La Défense Arena at the personal invitation of Brigitte Macron, France’s first lady. Naturally, I found the performance on YouTube. Thirty-five thousand people filled the arena as thousands of voices in France roared the Korean lyric, “adeuri neom jal nagaseo mianhae, eomma.” One need not own a purple light stick to recognize that kind of cultural power. Afterward, I became mildly obsessed with J-Hope and, by association, BTS. Original photo by Sudhith Xavier. Photoshop by ChatGPT. A song currently in heavy rotation on my playlist is SWIM, from their latest album, ARIRANG. The album debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 and remained there for three consecutive weeks. During its debut week, its songs occupied the top nine positions on the...

Shrimp & Kimchi Inari

Inarizushi emerged in Japan during the Edo period, when seasoned fried tofu pockets filled with vinegared rice became popular as inexpensive street food. Its name is tied to Inari, the deity associated with rice, agriculture and prosperity, and to the foxes regarded as Inari’s messengers and linked in folklore to fried tofu. Inari, however, has never been Japanese to me. Growing up in South Korea, I knew it as yubu chobap, a meal my mom packed for school lunches and picnics—and one that always felt like a treat. Rather than sushi rice, she filled the tofu pockets with different kinds of fried rice. Perhaps that is why I have never regarded the pouch as something requiring too much fidelity. Shrimp & Kimchi Inari is my homage to kimchi fried rice, only quieter: shrimp and kimchi folded into rice with less seasoning than I would ordinarily use for the fried rice version. The restraint is intentional. The lighter seasoning leaves room for the fried tofu skin, with its distinctive swee...

Pasta al Tonno: A Korean Gal’s Ramyeon in Pasta

Growing up Korean, ramyeon was the reliable quick meal: intensely satisfying, reliably filling, and unlikely to leave much of a dent in the bank account. It was a cheap thrill, the sort of thing we were regularly warned was not particularly healthy while continuing to keep it stocked in nearly every Korean home. That contradiction was built into its history. Korean ramyeon was introduced in 1963, with government financing, as one possible response to South Korea’s severe postwar food shortage. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Once regarded largely as budget food, ramyeon now commands a global following that could almost compete with BTS. ARMY, please hold the hate mail. Pasta al tonno may not share ramyeon’s austere, mission-driven origin, but it occupies a similarly dependable place in many Italian kitchens, particularly among younger cooks and college students. It is quick, inexpensive, and deeply satisfying without putting an unnecessary dent in the wallet. Humble ...

Curated: Ballet Flats for Fashionistas

The ballet flat began, quite literally, with a foot in the theater. Claire McCardell and Capezio helped coax the slipper from studio floor to city pavement in the 1940s, while Audrey Hepburn and Brigitte Bardot later supplied the sort of cinematic endorsement no advertising budget could manufacture. What had been designed for pliés became a shorthand for modern femininity: graceful without fragility, polished without the architectural inconvenience of a heel. at Musée d'Orsay, Paris, France Its staying power lies in that contradiction. The ballet flat is delicate but practical, prim but faintly rebellious—the shoe of a woman who has somewhere to be and no intention of arriving with sore feet. And so, with a small curtsy and considerably better arch support, here are 12 curated ballet flats ready to take their turn in the spotlight. ANCIENT GREEK SANDALS Iro PVC Ballet Flats JavaScript is currently disabled in this browser. Reactivate it to view this content. ANCIENT GREEK SANDALS I...

Curated Sunglasses: Shades Without the Mourning

Sunglasses began as utility: a practical defense against glare, wind, and the indignities of squinting. Then fashion claimed them. Frames grew bolder, lenses darker, silhouettes more deliberate, until sunglasses became less an accessory than a small act of self-invention—the quickest way to suggest mystery, polish, or studied indifference. I lose sunglasses the way other people lose packs of gum: casually, repeatedly, and without explanation. After enough expensive disappearances and appropriate mourning periods, I now wear budget-friendly pairs almost exclusively. These 12 curated sunglasses offer the pleasure of a fashion statement without requiring a period of mourning when one inevitably vanishes. The trouble with a small indulgence is that shipping can cost nearly as much as the thing itself—unless, of course, one reaches the minimum. To spare us that particular absurdity, all 12 were curated from Amazon Prime. JOOPIN Oversized Sunglasses ZENOTTIC Retro Square Polarized Sunglasses...

Seafood Jajang Deopbap

Jajang, born from Chinese zhajiangmian and transformed in Korea into the rich, dark sauce made with chunjang, has become woven into the fabric of Korean everyday life. What began as an adapted working-class meal of black bean sauce (jajang) over noodles (myeon) in port cities has evolved into a national comfort food, synonymous with quick delivery, moving days, and casual family meals. Jajangmyeon was the pizza and burgers of my childhood. End-of-school semesters and good test scores were acknowledged with jajangmyeon. My grandparents always had it delivered when I stayed with them during school breaks, a proper opening to days of my grandmother’s home-cooked meals to come. Ceramic bowls were wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Its presence is as cultural as it is culinary: from shared bowls among students and office workers to its symbolic role on Black Day, when singles gather to eat jajangmyeon together. It is the unofficially official meal on moving day. More than just a sauce, jajang r...

Debaucheries of the Far Right

That, in the simplest terms, is how I understand the recent rulings of the Supreme Court of the United States. We are now free to carry concealed handguns without meaningful state regulation. Women and girls are being forced to give birth, even in cases of rape and incest. We are increasingly unrestrained in our destruction of the environment. Prayer is being ushered back into public schools under the guise of freedom. What else can this be called, if not the debaucheries of this nation’s far right? Photo by Fred Moon on Unsplash When I began writing about political and social issues, it was not merely to register my personal views. It was to draw attention to something larger: the state of our shared humanity. Last November, when I referenced New York State’s gun control case before the Supreme Court alongside a recipe , I did not analyze the ruling in detail. I wrote instead about the deeper unease it stirred in me—the sorrow of realizing how many people live in such fear of one a...

The Devil Wears Jumpsuits

From rail yards and factory floors to cockpits and controlled descents, jumpsuits have carried a stubborn practicality that resists ornament while quietly absorbing it. What began as protection in the early 20th century became a uniform across aviation and wartime labor, particularly for women, then a symbol, and eventually a choice—one that moves between utility and presentation without fully belonging to either. That is what keeps them relevant: a garment that insists on function even when placed in spaces built on image. At a private screening. The photograph was edited to clean the background, shadows, and reflections using AI. Jumpsuits, in their most honest form, do not try to impress. They enclose the body with a kind of certainty: structured, utilitarian, unconcerned with polish. And yet, once placed within fashion’s gaze, even they are not immune. The silhouette tightened, the fabric softened, the fit became more intentional. What was once purely functional began to carry in...