Skip to main content

Let's Unite With Intelligence, Not Emotions

It has been difficult to watch as the alleged Cornell University gang rape saga unfolds. I am not minimizing what allegedly happened. As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse and domestic violence as an adult, I do not take what allegedly happened lightly. What happened to Jane Doe, I know she will never be able to escape—physically, mentally, or emotionally. I know her thoughts must take her to the darkest and cruelest moments, moments that at times must feel as though they will never end.


I have learned to accept those moments myself, the shame and rage turning so rapidly that eventually they become numbness, until something triggers them again. I have also learned that the numbness is when it becomes dangerous, when the conflict that keeps us “feeling” is subdued and settles into an acceptance: I am damaged. Forever.

So I know it is difficult—nearly impossible for some of us, and for legitimate reasons—to leave our emotions out of what allegedly happened beginning on October 19, 2024, and continuing into the early hours of the following day at the Chi Phi fraternity house.


What I survived pales in comparison with what Jane Doe has survived. I have read some of the Snapchat messages that have appeared on the internet, and I seriously question not just the parenting involved but the humanity of their parents. They were supposed to raise human beings. Instead, they raised trash.

You may be thinking that seems harsh for someone who appears to be maintaining some semblance of neutrality by consistently using “alleged” when mentioning the gang rape.

It isn't because I am neutral.


It is because women—yes, all of us female folks—have failed throughout history when we have shown up with emotion rather than intelligence. We have led with rage rather than our intelligence.

Why blame Cornell University? Why keep asking the university for accountability when history—and I mean recent history—has shown that universities have systematically failed to protect women under Title IX?


Why do we, women, expect universities to punish rapists when a university disciplinary process is not a substitute for the criminal justice system?

The allegation is rape—a gang rape. We are not talking about someone cheating on an exam. We are not talking about plagiarism. In the State of New York, first-degree rape is a violent felony sex offense, carrying a minimum prison sentence of five years for a first-time adult felony offender, followed by five to twenty years of post-release supervision.

So you can imagine my outrage when I see women outraged that Cornell didn't expel all of them from school.


B*tch! What the fu*k are you even saying?

Why are we upset about expulsion when expulsion would have been the natural consequence if this had been treated accordingly as a criminal act and resulted in convictions? Please stop demanding that Cornell University should have done more. That is saying expulsion should have been sufficient.


Jane Doe deserves more than anything Cornell administrators could ever have imposed as punishment on these men.

Rape—in fact, any serious criminal activity—should never have been something schools were given the authority to simply discipline through a Title IX process. That should never have been allowed. Rape, even when reported to a campus police department staffed by sworn police officers, should immediately be reported to outside law enforcement—authorities who are not employed by the very university whose administrators have a duty to protect its institutional interests and reputation, and investigators and prosecutors who specialize in these crimes.

Once Cornell University Police turned its report over to the Tompkins County District Attorney's Office, as it did, there should have been an independent criminal investigation beginning with something painfully elementary: interviewing Jane Doe.


Now, nearly two years after the alleged gang rape, defense attorneys will have something they did not have in October 2024: time.

Time to challenge Jane Doe's memory. Time for evidence to disappear. Time for memories to fade. Time for seven accused men and their fraternity brothers to have discussed and aligned their accounts—not merely to protect the seven men accused, but potentially to protect the reputations of everyone who was in that house that night.


Unless, of course, one of them turns out to be human rather than trash and comes forward to tell the truth.

And there is another thing that enrages me greatly as a victim. Why are victims of campus rape expected to go through two processes, one disciplinary and another criminal? The trauma of having to relive what happened and then be questioned over and over again is greatly damaging, but campus rape victims are expected to go through two different investigative and testimonial processes. Why? How is that fair? How is this protecting victims?

So, why are women demanding that Cornell University should have done more? Its campus police turned over the case to the District Attorney's Office. The question is why Governor Kathy Hochul stopped at assigning New York Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor. If she truly believes that Jane Doe was not properly protected by the law, why did she not also call for an investigation into the conduct of Tompkins County DA Matthew Van Houten?


The combination of no independent interview, sole reliance on CUPD, and the newly disputed evidence trail related to the Snapchat screenshot reasonably forms the factual basis for asking the New York State Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct to investigate whether the office properly performed its duties. Why isn't Governor Hochul willing to call for that investigation instead of simply removing Van Houten's office from this case and assigning it to AG James? If she owns the very words she spoke, then asking for scrutiny of what went wrong in the District Attorney's Office is the natural next step.

And why aren't we demanding an investigation into how a prosecutor who had the power to pursue justice for Jane Doe nearly two years ago allowed these seven men to bypass the criminal process, rather than simply accepting that he has now been removed from the case?

Why aren't we demanding an investigation into one man who had the authority to advocate for Jane Doe and bring these seven men to justice? We can't stop rape, but how different would the world be for women if men responsible for investigating and prosecuting these crimes were actually held accountable when they fail to do their job?

_____
More:

ESSAYS | RECIPES | STYLES | IG


Articles sélectionnés
I earn commission on qualified purchases.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who Investigated the Alleged Cornell Gang Rape?

This morning, my mind froze as I read about an alleged gang rape involving eight Cornell University students that occurred nearly two years ago, in 2024. Most of us learned the details only after Jane Doe filed a civil lawsuit on September 14, 2026, in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, against Matthew Ingalls, Johnathan Newell, Winston Lee, Gillio Lopes, Diego Sarabia, Scott Norris, and Scott Kretzschmar, alleging that the seven men raped her while they were students at Cornell University. The alleged assault occurred during the night of October 19 into the morning of October 20, 2024. Jane Doe later reported the incident to Cornell University Police. Cornell separately conducted its own disciplinary investigation, followed by hearings under its Title IX process, while Cornell University Police conducted the criminal investigation that was referred to the Tompkins County District Attorney’s Office. at LACMA No criminal charges followed. The District Attorney’s Office did n...

What If I Told You Tolerance Is Insane

A few years ago, I worked as a Project Manager for a marketing agency. What most people did not know was that I wasn’t simply managing marketing projects. Part of my job was to conduct root-cause analysis and privately address what I found with the VP of Operations. The agency was losing clients, and part of my assignment was to conduct root-cause analysis within the PMO. No one ever told me the two were connected, but I wondered whether leadership believed they might be. Ganna Walska Lotusland I worked alongside another Project Manager, a smart guy with a project management certification whose vertical happened to be one of the problematic ones. He didn’t know that evaluating his project pipeline was part of my assignment. His failure to follow project management best practices had already been escalated. He also had reluctance to escalate problems early enough to keep them from affecting clients. One Client Success Manager was a recurring problem. She routinely failed to turn in ...

Curated: The Seduction of Gloves

There is something inherently sexy about gloves, perhaps because they understand what fashion occasionally forgets: concealment can be far more provocative than exposure. For centuries, gloves signaled propriety, status, and restraint, placing a thin barrier between the hand and everyone it might touch. The irony is exquisite. Cover something ordinarily left bare and suddenly its unveiling becomes intimate. Hollywood certainly understood the assignment. An opera glove beside a bare shoulder did not temper the seduction; it sharpened it, turning the slow removal of something as innocuous as a glove into theater. Photo by Hans on Unsplash That delicious tension between restraint and revelation is what makes gloves such compelling style makers. Satin whispers old-Hollywood glamour. Supple leather carries a certain authority. A flash of color beneath an otherwise serious coat can do more for an outfit than another strategically purchased handbag ever will. And when Autumn finally begins i...

Is Feminism Destroying Us?

Are you bothered by the question? More than two decades ago, a dear friend, Andrea, ten years my senior, confided that she believed feminists had destroyed our lives. Back then, work-life balance did not exist. Back then, I was asked to terminate an employee simply because she was pregnant. at Laguna Art Museum I didn't. I also didn't exactly refuse. I told the company that it was more than welcome to terminate her, but as her direct manager, I saw no performance-related reason to end her employment and therefore would not sign her separation papers. If executive management wanted to terminate her, I would accept its decision. I simply would not lend my name to it. She was not terminated. I didn't refuse to sign because I was advocating for her rights. I refused because there was no reason to terminate her. I had terminated other employees for poor performance; pregnancy was not poor performance. And the order hadn't come from a man. It came from my boss, who was a woma...

Korean Gal's Guatemalan Red Beans with Pork Spare Ribs

Full transparency. I am afraid of pressure cookers. It is a fear instilled in me by my mom, a quiet but effective deterrent meant to keep me at a safe distance—especially when the pressure is being released. Reasonable? Perhaps. I would consider a therapist, but it has been years since I have needed one. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. When I saw the Pressure Cooker Guatemalan Red Beans with Beef Short Ribs recipe in The World Central Kitchen Cookbook: Feeding Humanity, Feeding Hope , I knew I had to make a version of my own—one that did not require a pressure cooker. I also wanted the ingredients to feel simpler, more accessible. More importantly, I wanted the dish to center the red beans, rather than have them overshadowed by the richness of beef short ribs. This is not a bean stew, but a slow braise—one that relies on the gradual release of moisture from the ingredients themselves. So, changes were made—and thus, the name: Korean Gal’s Guatemalan Red Beans with P...

Lime et Elephant Garlic Flower Shrimp

One of my favorite Sunday rituals is a slow walk through the Hollywood Farmers Market. It’s one of the largest in the area, expansive without feeling overwhelming, and a reliable place to stumble onto ingredients you didn’t know you were looking for. On a recent visit, I stopped at a garlic and onion farmer’s stand and found myself drawn to a bundle of elephant garlic flowers—tall, architectural, and unexpectedly delicate. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. I brought them home partly to live on the kitchen counter for a few days, and partly to see what they could do in a pan. Garlic, after all, has always had an easy affinity with shrimp. Lime followed naturally. The result is this dish: quick, aromatic, and bright, with just enough heat to keep things alert. INGREDIENTS [serves 3 to 4 as a main course] one pound of shrimp, peeled and deveined two limes two tablespoons of brown sugar one stem of elephant garlic flower, petals only two garlic cloves, sliced a half tea...

Honey Sriracha Shrimp

Walnut shrimp is decidedly Chinese-American, with roots in Cantonese-style restaurant cooking. Crisp fried shrimp dressed in a sweet, creamy mayonnaise-based sauce and paired with candied walnuts became a Chinese restaurant favorite by the late twentieth century, particularly in California, before making the leap from banquet tables to the mainstream. I was introduced to walnut shrimp as an adult at a wedding banquet and did what any reasonable person who dislikes walnuts would do: I picked around them. Years later, I discovered that I am actually allergic to nuts, though thankfully not in the dramatic, call-an-ambulance kind of way. Apparently, my lifelong walnut avoidance had been onto something. So this is my version: nut-free walnut shrimp, which admittedly makes the name a little ridiculous, with Sriracha added for a kick because I’m that kind of gal. INGREDIENTS [serves 2 with rice] one pound large shrimp, peeled and deveined a half teaspoon kosher salt one egg white a third cu...

No Rice, No Deal Stir-Fry Bowl

For a while, I restrained myself from using salt and pepper in my cooking, partly because I had come to think of them as the two most overused seasonings, capable of keeping a dish from becoming more interesting than the obvious. At one point, I even wondered whether I had developed a sensitivity to salt; the slightest over-seasoning began tasting bitter to me. Salty filets at Michael Mina at Bellagio and Delilah at Wynn Las Vegas last year did little to repair the relationship. Trust me, an overly salted filet at an upscale restaurant is its own particular trauma, quite different from realizing the horrible flavor of McDonald’s new limited-edition Spicy Chicken McNuggets. I never abandoned salt entirely. I continued using it to enhance other spices and ingredients, but deliberately salty flavors, even those built around soy sauce, became increasingly rare in my kitchen. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Until recently. No Rice, No Deal Stir-Fry Bowl is deliberately veg...

Jeju Linguine al Nero di Seppia: Gochujang Squid Pasta

Off the southern coast of the Korean peninsula lies Jeju Island, a place where the sea shapes both livelihood and cuisine. Among its prized catches is Jeju squid, known for its clean sweetness and tender bite—qualities that have long made it a favorite in Korean kitchens. Whether grilled over charcoal or gently simmered in spicy stews, Jeju squid carries the unmistakable flavor of the surrounding waters. Ceramic bowl was wheel-thrown and glazed by me. This dish brings that ingredient into a conversation between two culinary traditions. Linguine al nero di seppia, the Italian pasta tinted black with squid ink, becomes the canvas for a sauce layered with Korean flavors. The foundation begins with olive oil, onion, and garlic, followed by white wine and tomato paste that deepen in color as they cook. Then comes gochujang, whose fermented heat introduces the unmistakable character of Korean cooking. What makes the dish sing, however, is its balance. The richness of butter softens the inten...

Seafood Jajang Deopbap

Jajang, born from Chinese zhajiangmian and transformed in Korea into the rich, dark sauce made with chunjang, has become woven into the fabric of Korean everyday life. What began as an adapted working-class meal of black bean sauce (jajang) over noodles (myeon) in port cities has evolved into a national comfort food, synonymous with quick delivery, moving days, and casual family meals. Jajangmyeon was the pizza and burgers of my childhood. End-of-school semesters and good test scores were acknowledged with jajangmyeon. My grandparents always had it delivered when I stayed with them during school breaks, a proper opening to days of my grandmother’s home-cooked meals to come. Ceramic bowls were wheel-thrown and glazed by me. Its presence is as cultural as it is culinary: from shared bowls among students and office workers to its symbolic role on Black Day, when singles gather to eat jajangmyeon together. It is the unofficially official meal on moving day. More than just a sauce, jajang r...